EXPLAINABLE FUZZY–GENETIC MODELING OF SLEEP AND SENSORY DYSREGULATION IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER: A FIVE-CONTINENT ANALYSIS OF OPEN-ACCESS PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL DATA
EXPLAINABLE FUZZY–GENETIC MODELING OF SLEEP AND SENSORY DYSREGULATION IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER: A FIVE-CONTINENT ANALYSIS OF OPEN-ACCESS PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL DATA
ABSTRACT
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by differences
in social communication and interaction, restricted and repetitive behaviors, and atypical sensory
processing. Increasing evidence indicates that sensory processing differences are not merely
associated features of ASD but may significantly influence behavioral, cognitive, social, and daily
functioning. Individuals with ASD may exhibit diverse sensory response patterns, including
hyperresponsivity, hypo responsivity, and sensory seeking across visual, auditory, tactile,
olfactory, gustatory, proprioceptive, and interoceptive domains. These sensory differences have
been associated with attention, anxiety, sleep disturbances, feeding difficulties, repetitive
behaviors, and social functioning. Neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies suggest that
sensory processing in ASD may involve alterations at both cortical and subcortical levels.
Differences in sensory gating, habituation, multisensory integration, temporal processing, and the
balance between cortical excitation and inhibition have been proposed as potential mechanisms
underlying atypical sensory responses. GABAergic interneurons, thalamocortical connectivity,
the oxytocinergic system, and neuroplasticity have also been investigated in relation to sensory
dysfunction. However, the considerable heterogeneity of sensory profiles in ASD suggests that
sensory processing differences cannot be explained by a single neurobiological mechanism. The
significant impact of sensory processing differences on everyday functioning highlights the
importance of early assessment and individualized intervention. Sensory-based occupational
therapy and Ayres Sensory Integration approaches are among the interventions used to address
sensory difficulties and improve functional participation. Nevertheless, the evidence regarding
intervention effectiveness remains heterogeneous, emphasizing the need to consider individual
sensory profiles, developmental characteristics, and functional needs when planning
interventions. In conclusion, sensory processing differences represent an important dimension of
the multidimensional nature of ASD. Further research should focus on identifying sensory
subtypes, clarifying the relationships between neurobiological mechanisms and behavioral
manifestations, and evaluating individualized interventions. A better understanding of sensory
processing may contribute to improving quality of life, adaptive functioning, and participation in
everyday activities among autistic individuals.
ABSTRACT
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by differences
in social communication and interaction, restricted and repetitive behaviors, and atypical sensory
processing. Increasing evidence indicates that sensory processing differences are not merely
associated features of ASD but may significantly influence behavioral, cognitive, social, and daily
functioning. Individuals with ASD may exhibit diverse sensory response patterns, including
hyperresponsivity, hypo responsivity, and sensory seeking across visual, auditory, tactile,
olfactory, gustatory, proprioceptive, and interoceptive domains. These sensory differences have
been associated with attention, anxiety, sleep disturbances, feeding difficulties, repetitive
behaviors, and social functioning. Neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies suggest that
sensory processing in ASD may involve alterations at both cortical and subcortical levels.
Differences in sensory gating, habituation, multisensory integration, temporal processing, and the
balance between cortical excitation and inhibition have been proposed as potential mechanisms
underlying atypical sensory responses. GABAergic interneurons, thalamocortical connectivity,
the oxytocinergic system, and neuroplasticity have also been investigated in relation to sensory
dysfunction. However, the considerable heterogeneity of sensory profiles in ASD suggests that
sensory processing differences cannot be explained by a single neurobiological mechanism. The
significant impact of sensory processing differences on everyday functioning highlights the
importance of early assessment and individualized intervention. Sensory-based occupational
therapy and Ayres Sensory Integration approaches are among the interventions used to address
sensory difficulties and improve functional participation. Nevertheless, the evidence regarding
intervention effectiveness remains heterogeneous, emphasizing the need to consider individual
sensory profiles, developmental characteristics, and functional needs when planning
interventions. In conclusion, sensory processing differences represent an important dimension of
the multidimensional nature of ASD. Further research should focus on identifying sensory
subtypes, clarifying the relationships between neurobiological mechanisms and behavioral
manifestations, and evaluating individualized interventions. A better understanding of sensory
processing may contribute to improving quality of life, adaptive functioning, and participation in
everyday activities among autistic individuals.
مطالب بیشتر از دکتر فرشید گنجی
پاسخ به پرسش